Suggestions for IPDAS Quality Dimensions
Background
IPDAS is an international collaboration that aims to enhance the quality and
effectiveness of patient decision aids.
To this end, IPDAS has created an IPDAS Checklist that can be used as an evidence-informed framework
for improving the content, development, and evaluation of patient decision aids.
[Elwyn et al., in BMJ 2006; 333(7565) 417]
The original IPDAS Checklist consists of 12 Quality Dimensions, which are:
- Using A Systematic Development Process
- Providing Information About Options
- Presenting Probabilities
- Clarifying And Expressing Values
- Using Personal Stories
- Guiding / Coaching In Deliberation And Communication
- Disclosing Conflicts Of Interest
- Delivering Decision Aids On The Internet
- Balancing The Presentation of Information and Options
- Addressing Health Literacy
- Basing Information On Comprehensive, Critically Appraised, And Up-To-Date Syntheses Of The Scientific Evidence
- Establishing The Effectiveness
Each of these 12 Quality Dimensions incorporates several dimension-specific Criteria.
Current Situation
Given rapid developments in this field, it's necessary for the IPDAS Collaboration to regularly review the
Quality Dimensions and specific Criteria.
- Some of the current Quality Dimensions / Criteria may need to be replaced.
- New Quality Dimensions / Criteria may need to be added to the current Checklist.
The Purpose of this Document
The IPDAS Collaboration's Steering Committee invites you to provide us with your opinion about
modifying the existing–or adding new–Quality Dimensions / Quality Criteria to the IPDAS Checklist.
Please copy and paste the questions below into an email message, provide the requested information and send it to
ipdas@ohri.ca.
Submissions will be reviewed by the IPDAS Collaboration's Steering Committee.
|